Draft representations to DM & CEO
Email to Kosmos AOA sharing draft letters for approval.
Open PDFOur Initiatives · Resident safety
Official Representations, Meetings & Follow-up with NOIDA Authority
Letters · Correspondence · RTI
Email to Kosmos AOA sharing draft letters for approval.
Open PDFLetter requesting action on reported safety concerns and meeting minutes; the letter itself is undated.
Open PDFFirst appeal referencing the original RTI application dated 2 September 2026.
Open PDFRepresentation requesting clarification and a time-bound Action Taken Report.
Open PDFLocation: Kosmos Society, Jaypee Wish Town, Sector 134, Noida, Uttar Pradesh
Residents of Kosmos Society have been raising concerns regarding reported aggressive and biting community dogs, the safety of residents, and the effectiveness of official dog-management activities within the society.
The matter has been pursued through written representations, meetings with NOIDA Authority officials, follow-up communications, and the Right to Information (RTI) process.
The purpose of this page is to maintain a transparent, date-wise record of the representations made, meetings held, documents submitted, acknowledgements received, and actions requested from the concerned authorities.
The matter is being pursued through documented communication and engagement with the concerned authorities. The focus is on resident safety, accountability, timely administrative action, and compliance with applicable rules and directions.
All correspondence and updates published on this page should be read alongside the relevant supporting documents. Allegations and reported incidents are presented as such unless independently established by an official record or competent authority.
The following is a chronological record of the communications shared for this matter. Copies of available letters, emails, acknowledgements, and related documents should be linked against their respective entries.
| Date | Recipient / Activity | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 23 June 2026 | CEO, NOIDA Authority | Representation regarding the dog-safety issue |
| 1 July 2026 | CEO, NOIDA Authority — Shri Krishna Karunesh | Further representation and follow-up |
| 15 July 2026 | Correspondence with Kosmos AOA | Draft representations for the District Magistrate and CEO shared for approval; submission to the authorities is not established by the supplied email |
| 19 August 2026 | Amicus Curiae appointed by the High Court — Mr Kunal Shah | Communication regarding the matter |
| 27 August 2026 | Amicus Curiae appointed by the High Court — Mr Kunal Shah | Further communication and follow-up |
| 2 September 2026 | RTI application (referenced in the first appeal) | Seeking information on dog management and public safety |
| 3 September 2026 | ACEO, NOIDA Authority — Shri Pushp Raj Singh | Representation and follow-up regarding the issue |
| 10 September 2026 | ACEO, NOIDA Authority — Shri Pushp Raj Singh | Written documentation of the meeting held with NOIDA Authority officials on 8 September |
| 16 September 2026 | ACEO, NOIDA Authority | Follow-up regarding reported aggressive/biting dogs and alleged obstruction of official dog-catching activities |
| 1 October 2026 | RTI first appeal — acknowledgement | First appeal relating to RTI Application No. 33689/02.09.2026/6581/PIO |
| 14 October 2026 | ACEO, NOIDA Authority — Shri Pushp Raj Singh | Urgent follow-up seeking action, clarification, and a time-bound Action Taken Report |
| 16 October 2026 | ACEO, NOIDA Authority — Shri Pushp Raj Singh | Follow-up regarding the RTI matter |
Record note: Entries without a linked supporting document are based on the supplied chronology and remain unverified. The July email shares draft letters for approval, not proof of submission. The 1 October acknowledgement concerns a first appeal; the appeal references an original RTI application dated 2 September 2026.
Meetings were held with the Additional Chief Executive Officer (ACEO) of NOIDA Authority and other concerned officials to raise residents' concerns regarding reported aggressive/biting dogs and the implementation of dog-management measures.
The issues discussed included the effectiveness of field-level action, the handling of reported incidents, and follow-up on directions or assurances communicated during meetings.
A meeting was held with the ACEO and NOIDA Authority officials, with representatives from Kosmos Society and Paramount Society.
Representatives identified in the available information:
The meeting concerned the dog issue. The proceedings and follow-up were subsequently documented in an email sent to the ACEO on 10 September 2026.
The attendee list is based on the supplied summary; supporting meeting correspondence has not been provided.
Meetings were also held with the ACEO regarding the plaster-related concern and the dog-safety issue, including a meeting with the Senior Citizens Welfare Association team.
A separate meeting was held with the ACEO in the presence of Mr Bansal concerning both matters.
Pending verification: Dates, complete attendee details, and supporting correspondence for these meetings have not been provided.
Written follow-up was submitted to the ACEO to maintain a record of discussions and matters raised. In the 16 September representation, the request included preparation and circulation of minutes/proceedings of the meetings, along with the decisions and actions recorded.
An RTI application was submitted seeking information from NOIDA Authority concerning the management of stray/community dogs and related public-safety matters.
The available RTI-related documents record the following:
The RTI proceedings sought transparency regarding official records, action taken on reported incidents, implementation of directions, and the management of the dog-safety concerns.
The current status of the RTI application and appeal should be updated when an official response or order is received.
The written representations have requested attention to the following matters:
These are matters raised in the representations and requests submitted to the authorities. Their current implementation status should be published only after verification.
This section will be updated as verified information becomes available.
This page is intended to serve as a central, document-based record of the issue and the follow-up undertaken. It will be updated when new correspondence, official responses, meeting records, or verified action reports become available.
Residents are encouraged to share relevant information and supporting evidence through the appropriate society channels so that concerns can be documented accurately and presented to the competent authorities where necessary.